Decoding the Swedish Consensus: Why Your Decisiveness is Slowing You Down
- Scott Couper
- 4 days ago
- 2 min read
You are an experienced leader. You drive results.
But since moving to Sweden, meetings feel strangely slow.

You present a clear solution expecting a decision.
Instead you get polite nods, a working group, and a follow-up next week.
You are still capable, but less effective than before.
You have not lost your edge.
You have met a different decision system.
The hidden step you are missing
In Sweden the real decision rarely happens inside the meeting.
It happens before it. The word is förankring, or, anchoring.
Ideas are quietly discussed one-to-one, concerns are surfaced privately, and alignment is built informally.
The meeting is often just the moment the already-agreed decision becomes official.
When internationals push for a fast yes/no in the room, they are unknowingly skipping the part where the decision is actually made.
Why it feels frustrating
Many international corporate cultures operate top-down:
decide fast → adjust later.
Swedish organisations operate differently:
align first → decide once → execute quickly.
Research like Erin Meyer’s The Culture Map describes Sweden as highly egalitarian and consensual, but you don’t need the theory to feel it. You experience it every time a simple decision turns into a process.
Think endurance, not sprint
Trying to force speed here is like starting an Ironman marathon at sprint pace.
You burn energy, meet resistance, and nothing moves faster.
Once you shift approach, everything changes.
Because when a decision finally lands in Sweden, implementation is immediate. No pushback, no quiet resistance, no political drag.
What actually works
Before the meeting:
speak individually to key stakeholders
ask for input rather than approval
adjust the proposal early
During the meeting:
summarise shared understanding
confirm alignment
let the group validate the decision
After that, execution becomes easy.
Success here is not about working harder.
It is about understanding how responsibility and communication flow differently, and adapting without losing who you are.
If you keep replaying meetings afterwards wondering what you missed, we can map out the specific friction points and test small adjustments in real situations.




Comments